Supply chain disruptions caused by a number of unrelated events – the pandemic, ice storms, wildfires, and droughts – were commonplace in the retail industry in 2021. Obtaining the correct insurance coverage can help mitigate present and future supply chain risks. In the recently published Retail Industry 2021 Year In Review, we highlight some key concerns and coverages to look out for. A copy of the full publication can be found here.
Continue Reading Supply Chain Disruption? Don’t Overlook Insurance
Sima Kazmir
Hunton Andrews Kurth Attorneys Weigh In On How To Minimize Cyberattack Risks With Insurance
Hunton insurance attorneys, Walter Andrews, Andrea DeField, and Sima Kazmir, recently published an article in the Daily Business Review, discussing the scrutiny that companies face as a result of increased cyberattacks as well as tips for your next cyber insurance renewal. …
Continue Reading Hunton Andrews Kurth Attorneys Weigh In On How To Minimize Cyberattack Risks With Insurance
Navigating Coverage for Statutory Damages: Lessons Learned from DISH’s TCPA Defeat
What Happened:
The Tenth Circuit held that, under Colorado law, an insurer did not need to cover a satellite television provider under two commercial umbrella liability policies in connection with a lawsuit alleging the company’s telemarketing practices violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. §227 et seq.
Continue Reading Navigating Coverage for Statutory Damages: Lessons Learned from DISH’s TCPA Defeat
Policyholder Win Highlights Importance of D&O Policies In Mitigating COVID-19-Related Exposures
While policyholders have experienced a wide range of conflicting rulings related to COVID-19 business interruption losses, a recent Northern District of Illinois decision shows that the pandemic continues to present a range of exposures beyond business interruption losses, including for claims under directors and officers liability policies. In Federal Insurance Co. v. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, Inc., No. 20 C 6797 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 19, 2021), the court rejected the insurer’s broad reading of a professional services exclusion, contract exclusion, and the insurability of alleged restitution to deny coverage under a D&O policy for losses arising from a cancelled trade show.
…
Continue Reading Policyholder Win Highlights Importance of D&O Policies In Mitigating COVID-19-Related Exposures
Key Takeaways From OFAC’s Recent Guidance: Carefully Scrutinize Insurance Coverage And Respond To Cyber Incidents With The Assistance of Experienced Advisors
On September 21, 2021 and October 15, 2021, the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued reminders of the sanctions risks for facilitating ransom payments to designated malicious cyber actors. As discussed in our prior blogpost on OFAC’s October 1, 2020 advisory, OFAC has made clear that it is increasingly willing to bring enforcement actions against entities, including cyber insurers, that facilitate payments to sanctioned threat actors on behalf of corporate victims.
Continue Reading Key Takeaways From OFAC’s Recent Guidance: Carefully Scrutinize Insurance Coverage And Respond To Cyber Incidents With The Assistance of Experienced Advisors
Insured Directors Not “Necessary” for Complete Adjudication of Insurer’s Coverage Obligations
A federal court in New York denied an insurer’s attempt to dismiss a coverage dispute, rejecting the insurer’s contention that the individual insured directors were “necessary” parties. The insurer argued that, because the outcome of the coverage suit could jeopardize the directors’ indemnity and thereby implicate the D&O policy’s Side A coverage for non-indemnified losses, the directors had an indispensable interest in the litigation. The court disagreed.
The coverage dispute in LRN Corp. v. Markel Insurance Co., 1:20-cv-08431 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 23, 2021), arose from an underlying lawsuit in the Delaware Chancery Court brought by an LRN shareholder against the company and three of its directors. The plaintiff in the underlying lawsuit alleged that a self-tender offer by LRN to acquire shares of LRN’s common stock was coercive and part of a scheme that was in part orchestrated by the LRN’s directors. LRN, though dismissed from the underlying lawsuit, continued to pay legal fees for the named directors.
Continue Reading Insured Directors Not “Necessary” for Complete Adjudication of Insurer’s Coverage Obligations