Pennsylvania’s highest court recently rejected Erie Insurance Exchange’s argument that it had no duty to defend a claim arising out of a shooting because it did not involve an accident, and therefore, there was no “occurrence” under the policy. The court held that the duty to defend was triggered because the underlying allegations were not “patently outside the policy coverage.” This decision can have far reaching effects on other kinds of claims involving intentional conduct.
Continue Reading Pennsylvania Court Holds That Violent Acts Are Not Lethal To The Duty To Defend
Expected or Intended
Bermuda Form Insurance Arbitration Series: Key Features of the Bermuda Form Part 2
By Lorelie S. Masters & Paul T. Moura on
Posted in Cross-Border, Litigation Strategy
In this post in the Blog’s Bermuda Form Insurance Arbitration Series, we discuss additional features of the Bermuda Form that policyholders should take into consideration.
…
Continue Reading Bermuda Form Insurance Arbitration Series: Key Features of the Bermuda Form Part 2